The Worst Sports Bettors Fail To Understand This Concept | Presented by Kalshi

2026-01-22

 

 

4 Ways to Stop Thinking in Absolutes in Betting (Tested)

 

 

Are you tired of feeling emotionally wrecked after a close loss, convinced the game was rigged or the outcome was impossible? That feeling, that frustration, it's the poison guiding most unsuccessful bettors straight to ruin. The truth is, most people don't lose because they don't know sports. They lose because they fundamentally misunderstand what odds are demanding they believe.

 

This isn't about handing you secret picks or telling you that following three simple steps guarantees profit, because that isn't real. Instead, we're going back to basics. We're going to focus on training your brain to stop thinking in absolutes. When you shift from asking what *will* happen to understanding *how often* something happens, you immediately escape the losing game most people are stuck playing.

 

We’ll explore how ancient card games and childhood video games actually teach superior decision making compared to traditional sports books. By the end, you'll have concrete habits to rewire your decision-making process and start embracing probability over certainty.

 

Here's What We'll Cover

 

  • Why outcome based thinking destroys long term betting success
  • How odds translate directly into required win percentages
  • Lessons from card games about separating process from result
  • The simple pre bet exercise that forces probabilistic thinking

 

Understanding Why Odds Aren't Predictions

 

The biggest hurdle I see with sports bettors involves how they interact with the numbers. Odds, like minus 110 or plus 200, aren't statements of prediction. They are firm statements of probability disguised by the house edge.

 

When you see even money odds, minus 110 on both sides, a successful bettor's mind immediately calculates the required win rate. You need to be right about 52 and a half percent of the time just to break even. Most casual bettors, however, glance at that and think, "This feels like a coin flip," or worse, they don’t think about the math at all. They default to favorites and gut feelings.

 

Think about a heavy favorite, say minus 200. If you're stuck in absolute thinking, you see that as safe, or you balk at laying too much juice. But mathematically, minus 200 means this situation is only supposed to succeed two times out of every three attempts. It fails one out of every three times. If you don't internalize that failure rate, you're setting yourself up for a massive emotional crash when the expected loss finally hits.

 

Sports are inherently chaotic. Outcomes are noisy. Teams win games they shouldn't. If you treat every single wager like it is a binary prediction, you are inviting variance to emotionally wreck your bankroll. People end up yelling how they knew a bet wouldn't win, but that is outcome based thinking, and it is pure poison for sustainable betting.

 

Shifting to Displayed Probabilities

 

my experience, the way betting information is presented matters immensely. Traditional sports books show you the juice, the minus signs and plus signs. While seasoned bettors might convert that mentally, most people don't. They just ask, "Do I like this team or not?" This is where display matters. I genuinely appreciate seeing predicted markets framed as percentages, something like 57 percent versus 43 percent.

 

That subtle change forces a better question. You stop asking, "Is this going to happen?" and start asking, "Is my assessment better than the market’s 57 percent evaluation?" You are now disagreeing with the market only on degree and not declaring absolute certainty. While percentages don't remove the house take or variance, they make uncertainty unavoidable and train your brain to stop thinking in absolutes. For many, that single upgrade is monumental.

 

Learning Probability from Underground Card Rooms and Board Games

 

A lot of my foundational approach didn't come from modern sports analysis at all. It came from spending time around underground card rooms playing games like Poker, Scopa, or Briscolola. These are games filled with strategy, but also massive amounts of built in variance.

 

When you play these games repeatedly, you learn a crucial lesson very fast. You can make the objectively perfect decision, execute your strategy flawlessly, and still lose repeatedly because the cards simply didn't fall your way. Conversely, you can absolutely play poorly, make significant mistakes, and still win for a spell.

 

This is the exact confusion that trips up most people. They assume winning validates the decision and losing means the decision was wrong. In games where variance is accepted, that mindset falls apart quickly. Nobody flips the table over forever because they lost a big hand of poker. They review the hand, see what they missed, and adjust their process. That is a direct blueprint for improving your approach to stop thinking in absolutes about sports outcomes.

 

Hearts and Tycoon Games: The Unlikely Teachers

 

Other games that reinforced this idea for me had nothing to do with gambling. Take Hearts, a game I became obsessed with as a kid on the computer. People often think Hearts is just luck. But the passing phase, counting the remaining cards, and adjusting your strategy based on whether an opponent is aggressive or conservative involves significant skill.

 

You can do everything right in Hearts—perfect passing, perfect counting—and still get crushed on one hand because the card distribution didn't favor you. That doesn't mean your strategy was wrong. It means the distribution broke against you.

 

Consider management simulators like Roller Coaster Tycoon or Zoo Tycoon. These games quietly teach economics. Spend too aggressively, you go bankrupt. Play too conservatively, you stagnate. None of these games promise certainty. They only reward good decisions made consistently over the long haul. That preparation is exactly the mindset that most novice betters are missing when approaching stop thinking in absolutes.

 

Practical Steps to Stop Guaranteed Long Term Failure

 

So, what does this look like in practice if you want to transform your approach? It’s not about winning tomorrow. It's about stopping the habits that guarantee you lose over time. I preach one simple, critical habit.

 

Before you look at the posted odds for any game, prop, or event you plan to wager on, force yourself to write down an actual probability. This isn't a vibe. It isn't a lean. This needs to be an actual number you commit to: "I believe this team has a 60 percent chance of winning," or "This player goes over this total 54 percent of the time."

 

  • Step 1: Estimate Probability First. Write down your honest assessment of the likelihood of an outcome *before* seeing the market price.
  • Step 2: Compare Decision to Price. Next, look at the odds. Are they asking you to believe in an outcome at 53 percent (minus 110) when you thought it was 60 percent? Great, you found value.
  • Step 3: Review Process, Not Result. After the game, ask yourself: Would I make this exact bet again at that same price, regardless of the outcome? If the answer is yes, your process was good, even if you lost money that specific time.

 

This exercise rewires your brain faster than almost anything else because you are instantly disagreeing with the market on a number, moving away from binary certainty.

 

Another counterintuitive, but vital, step is learning to watch sports without having money on the line sometimes. If you only experience games through a financial lens, every outcome feels intensely personal and chaotic. Watching without a stake reminds you that sports are inherently random, and the most obvious outcomes frequently don't materialize. This helps reinforce the concept that variance is real in sports betting, making your transition toward stop thinking in absolutes much smoother.

 

Common Questions About Thinking Probabilistically

 

What Does It Mean to Think Probabilistically?

 

Thinking probabilistically means abandoning the idea that you must be perfectly correct on every single event. Instead, you focus on making decisions where your assessed probability suggests the odds offered by the market are too low or too high for the true likelihood. It means accepting that you will be wrong frequently, but your long term equity will grow because you are consistently finding small edges.

 

Why Do I Get So Emotional When I Lose a Bet I Was Sure About?

 

That intense emotion comes from viewing the bet as a prediction of the future instead of a wager on a measured probability. When you think something is a foregone conclusion and it loses, your brain perceives that as a major failure of intelligence, not just a normal statistical deviation. This is the core danger of prediction bias showing itself in your bankroll.

 

Does Adopting This Mindset Guarantee I Will Be Profitable?

 

No, it absolutely does not. Thinking probabilistically isn't a magic shield. If you consistently make poor analyses, thinking probabilistically won't fix that. It will, however, stop you from employing specific thought patterns that mathematically guarantee long term failure. It moves you closer to where successful betting actually lives.

 

How Do Card Games Help Me Master Stop Thinking in Absolutes?

 

Card games like Hearts or Spades emphasize that luck has a huge, unavoidable role. You learn that the best strategic move can still result in a loss due to how the cards distribute. This experience trains your brain to accept that process quality is separate from immediate result quality, a vital lesson for any long term sports better.

 

If I Start Thinking Probabilistically, Will I Still Be Able to Handle Downswings?

 

Yes, that is one of the primary benefits. When you lose a downswing, your focus shifts from "I was wrong" to "Did my underlying process remain sound during this stretch?" If you would still make the same initial probability assessment today, then the downswing is just variance doing its job, not a failure of your intelligence.

 

Your Next Steps

 

We covered a lot of ground, moving from Roller Coaster Tycoon to the trenches of card rooms, all to hammer home one central point: your brain must rewire itself away from certainty. Remember these two things: First, identify your confidence level as a number before you see the price. Second, validate your process after the event, not just your win or loss.

 

If you stick to separating outcome from process, you're immediately adopting a mindset that separates you from 90 percent of the betting public, who are guaranteed to fail long term because they think in absolutes. The goal isn't to be right all the time. The goal is to be right often enough at the right prices.

 

I'm curious about your journey. What is one game, board game, puzzle, or even a work project that you feel trained your brain to manage risk and probability better? Drop that insight in the comments below. Your next step is practicing that initial probability dump on your very next bet. Start living without the illusion of certainty.

 

 

About Circle Back

 

To support Circles Back: Sign up for new sportsbook accounts using our custom links and offers. Click HERE.

 

Stay Updated: Subscribe for more Circle Back content on your favourite platforms:

 

Follow Us on Social Media:

 

🔨 Sign up to Kirk's Hammer

 

Scale Your Winnings With Betstamp PRO

Betstamp Pro saves you time and resources by identifying edges across 100+ sportsbooks in real-time. Leverage the most efficient true line in the industry and discover why Betstamp Pro is essential for top-down bettors.

 

Limited number of spots available! Apply for your free 1-on-1 product demo by clicking the banner below.

Episode Transcript

[00:00] So, I'm sitting here in my home office

[00:01] today. Got served up some video of some

[00:04] record-breaking new roller coasters in

[00:07] Saudi Arabia, watching them. I'm a big

[00:09] roller coasters guy. I enjoy them. So,

[00:11] that leads me to downloading an old game

[00:13] that I played throughout my youth, uh,

[00:15] Roller Coaster Tycoon. I spend a few

[00:17] hours catching up on that. It's actually

[00:19] amazing how much of of the strategy

[00:21] sticks with you, even over a long period

[00:23] of time. I decide it's time to move on

[00:26] to something else. I spent too much time

[00:28] on this. load up Twitter per usual. I

[00:31] get served up a bunch of tweets in my

[00:33] for you section. I don't know what's

[00:34] happened to my algorithm, but

[00:36] regardless, get a bunch of these tweets

[00:38] about how the Broncos have no chance to

[00:40] beat the Patriots this upcoming weekend.

[00:43] And obviously, they're underdogs right

[00:44] now. They're four and a half point

[00:46] underdogs in the market. It hits me, I

[00:49] can work all of this into one video that

[00:51] I think makes a lot of sense to people.

[00:53] Uh I'm Rob Pazola. I'm a pro sports

[00:55] [music] better. I went from a big-time

[00:57] losing better to a big- time winning

[00:59] better in my lifetime. And the reality

[01:01] is most sports betterers don't lose

[01:04] because they don't know sports. They

[01:06] lose because they don't understand what

[01:08] odds are actually asking them to

[01:11] believe. This isn't a Pix video. I'm not

[01:13] here to tell you, you know, do these

[01:14] three things and suddenly you're going

[01:16] to be a profitable better. For the most

[01:18] part, that's not real. This video is

[01:20] about something way more basic and

[01:23] honestly something that I think is way

[01:24] more important, which is learning to

[01:27] stop thinking in absolutes. Because the

[01:30] moment you start thinking in terms of

[01:32] what will happen instead of how often

[01:35] something happens, you're already

[01:38] playing a losing game.

[01:46] >> [music]

[01:51] >> The biggest disconnect I see with most

[01:52] betters is how they interact with odds.

[01:55] Right? Odds aren't predictions,

[01:58] they're probabilities. But almost nobody

[02:01] actually treats them that way. When

[02:03] someone sees minus 110 on both sides of

[02:05] a game, their brain doesn't go to, you

[02:08] know, I need to be right about 52 and a

[02:11] half percent of the time to break even

[02:12] here. They think this feels like a coin

[02:15] flip coin flip game or or they may not

[02:17] even think about anything at all. And

[02:19] that's already a problem. When they see

[02:22] minus 200, they don't think, you know,

[02:24] this fails one out of every three times.

[02:26] They think, well, this is a big

[02:28] favorite. This is safe until it isn't.

[02:31] Or or conversely, they think, I I don't

[02:32] want to lay this much juice, which is

[02:35] already an objectively bad way of

[02:38] thinking. So instead of asking the right

[02:40] question which is how often does this

[02:44] need to win betters ask what's going to

[02:47] happen and those are two completely

[02:51] different things. Sports are chaotic

[02:55] outcomes are very noisy.

[02:57] Teams win sometimes when they don't

[02:59] deserve to win and vice versa. If you

[03:01] treat every bet like it's a binary

[03:04] prediction, you're setting yourself up

[03:06] to get emotionally wrecked by variance.

[03:10] And that's why you see people say things

[03:11] like, "I knew that was going to lose,"

[03:13] or, "There was no way that was winning."

[03:15] That's outcomebased thinking. That is

[03:18] what I consider to be poison for

[03:21] betting. The goal isn't to be right all

[03:24] the time.

[03:26] It's not that. The goal is to be right

[03:29] often enough at the prices you're

[03:31] paying. If you don't train your brain to

[03:34] think that way, it doesn't matter how

[03:36] much ball you know. It's going to lead

[03:37] to nowhere. Can watch a million games

[03:40] like I did in my youth. Doesn't matter.

[03:43] Now, shameless plug incoming for our

[03:45] sponsor Cali here because this is where

[03:48] I think the way betting information is

[03:50] presented really matters as well. Most

[03:52] sports books show you odds. That's

[03:55] traditionally how I grew up as well.

[03:56] minus 110, plus 120, you know, minus

[03:59] 200, whatever it is. If you've been

[04:01] doing this a long time at a high level,

[04:04] your brain, like mine, might convert

[04:07] those to probabilities automatically

[04:10] right away. I don't know, that's just

[04:11] the way my brain works. For most people,

[04:13] that never happens. They're not

[04:15] thinking, what does this price imply?

[04:18] They're thinking, do I like this or not?

[04:22] Is this team going to win or not? That's

[04:25] why I actually like seeing probabilities

[04:27] displayed on these prediction markets.

[04:28] When you see something framed as, you

[04:31] know, 57% versus 43%, it forces a

[04:35] different question. You're no longer

[04:37] asking, is this going to happen? You're

[04:39] asking, is this more likely than 57%. A

[04:43] and that subtle shift, it can mean a lot

[04:46] for some betters. And yes, this is where

[04:48] I acknowledge the obvious. Khi is our

[04:50] sponsor here at Circles Off. I know how

[04:52] that looks. I'm not pretending

[04:53] otherwise, but this is also something I

[04:55] genuinely believe. Seeing percentages

[04:57] instead of odds makes uncertainty

[05:00] unavoidable. Really, you're disagreeing

[05:03] with the market on degree, not

[05:05] necessarily declaring, you know,

[05:08] certainty about an outcome. That doesn't

[05:10] mean you're suddenly going to win.

[05:12] Percentages, they don't remove vig or

[05:15] fees. They don't remove variance. They

[05:18] don't protect you from bad bets. But

[05:20] what they do do is train your brain to

[05:22] stop thinking in absolutes. And for a

[05:24] lot of betterers, that alone is a

[05:27] massive, massive upgrade. A lot of the

[05:29] way I think about betting didn't come

[05:31] from sports books at all. Uh this is

[05:34] just a my experience in life. It came

[05:36] from growing up around a lot of

[05:38] underground card rooms. Uh sometimes

[05:41] would be poker games, sometimes playing

[05:45] stuff that's not poker, lot of other

[05:46] card games. uh hearts individually,

[05:50] spades with partners. I don't know if

[05:51] anyone has ever seen one of these

[05:53] before. Uh this would be a classic

[05:56] Napolitan deck of Italian cards, you

[06:00] know, very very different, but uh I was

[06:02] trained on these growing up. Italian

[06:05] card games, games where nobody ever

[06:08] promises that, you know, doing the right

[06:11] thing means that you're going to win. A

[06:13] lot of these games, which again, maybe

[06:16] not super popular. Scopa, Briscolola,

[06:18] Bestia, Chinquento. These are games that

[06:22] involve strategy, but they also have a

[06:24] lot of variance. You learn pretty

[06:26] quickly,

[06:28] especially if you play these games

[06:29] repeatedly, that you can make the best

[06:31] possible decision and you can still lose

[06:35] over and over. And you also learn the

[06:37] exact opposite, which is also very

[06:39] dangerous. You can play badly,

[06:42] really poorly, make mistakes, and you

[06:44] can still win for a while.

[06:47] And that's where most people get

[06:48] confused. They assume that winning

[06:51] validates the decision and losing means

[06:55] the decision was wrong. But when you

[06:58] play in in underground card rooms,

[07:01] that mindset gets exposed very fast.

[07:03] Nobody flips the table and and quits

[07:06] forever because they lost a big poker

[07:08] hand. Well, at least not where I played.

[07:10] Maybe some of your games. I don't know.

[07:11] Can't speak to everyone. Everyone

[07:13] understands that variance is part of the

[07:15] game. Especially in good rooms, you look

[07:17] back at at how you played the hand. You

[07:19] think about what you missed, you adjust.

[07:22] And that way of thinking carries over

[07:25] perfectly to betting. If you treat every

[07:27] bet like a verdict on your intelligence,

[07:30] you're going to tilt yourself into

[07:32] oblivion.

[07:33] But if you treat every bet like a a hand

[07:37] of cards, something where the only thing

[07:39] you actually control

[07:41] is the decision, then everything changes

[07:44] for you. That's where I learned to

[07:47] separate outcome from process. Once you

[07:50] make that separation,

[07:52] sports betting starts to look and feel

[07:55] very different.

[07:57] A lot of this way of thinking got

[07:58] reinforced for me through games that had

[08:01] nothing to do with betting. Take hearts

[08:03] for example. I became borderline

[08:06] obsessive with hearts. When uh when my

[08:09] father got me my first computer, I want

[08:12] to say I was early 90s, maybe five or

[08:14] six years old, something like that. It

[08:17] was preloaded with four games.

[08:21] Older guys like me would would remember.

[08:24] You had Solitaire, you had Mind Sweeper,

[08:26] you had Freell, and Hearts.

[08:29] I love playing those games on the

[08:30] computer. A lot of them involve

[08:31] strategy. I eventually got so good at

[08:33] hearts that I would play the computer

[08:35] opponent with the sole goal of winning

[08:39] the game in four straight hands by

[08:41] shooting the moon four times in a row.

[08:44] Eventually,

[08:45] I got really good at that. I grew up. I

[08:48] started playing with friends at at local

[08:50] cafes. I became even more obsessive. I

[08:52] have uh a little bit of an addictive

[08:54] personality and I I obsess over games

[08:57] and and a lot of people play hearts and

[08:59] they think it's just a lot of luck, but

[09:02] there's way more strategy than it gets

[09:03] credit for, especially even in something

[09:06] like the passing phase. Who you pass to

[09:09] matters. What kind of player they are

[09:12] matters. Are they aggressive? Are they

[09:14] conservative? Do they chase moons? Uh do

[09:17] they panic when they get stuck with

[09:18] points? Are they leading? Are they

[09:20] trailing? You're not just playing the

[09:22] cards anymore. You're now playing the

[09:24] people. There's more strategy involved

[09:26] in that. And you can do everything

[09:28] right. You can pass correctly. You can

[09:31] count what's still out there and know

[09:32] every card that's still out there in

[09:33] your head. And you can still get crushed

[09:35] on a hand. That doesn't mean the

[09:37] strategy was wrong or that you played

[09:39] wrong. Sometimes it just means the

[09:42] distribution didn't break your way. And

[09:44] that lesson carries over perfectly to

[09:47] betting.

[09:48] The same thing has happened for me with

[09:50] board games. I'm a big board game player

[09:53] as well. Uh a game that's very popular

[09:55] is ticket to ride. You're you're

[09:57] constantly weighing probabilities. Do I

[10:00] push for this long route now or do I

[10:03] play it safe and and maybe get risk

[10:06] getting blocked later on? You don't know

[10:08] what cards are coming either, but you

[10:10] have to make decisions anyways along the

[10:12] way. Azul is a very popular tile game.

[10:15] Another great example. You can take the

[10:18] short-term points now. You can set

[10:21] yourself up for a bigger payoff later,

[10:23] but you risk taking penalties if things

[10:26] don't line up. That that's basically

[10:29] variance management, right?

[10:33] Even another game I like for for a long

[10:35] while, space base. This is a game where

[10:37] dice are involved. Forces you to think

[10:39] in distributions. You're not betting on

[10:42] a six coming up. You're betting on how

[10:45] often sixes show up over time and how

[10:47] that compounds.

[10:49] I also grew up on on all these tycoon

[10:52] games, right? Roller Coaster Tycoon,

[10:55] which I mentioned off the top, Zoo

[10:56] Tycoon, Golf Resort Tycoon. Those games,

[11:00] they they quietly teach you economics,

[11:03] capital allocation, risk management. If

[11:06] you spend too aggressively, you go bust.

[11:07] You play too conservatively, you

[11:09] stagnate and you don't grow.

[11:12] I know it sounds ridiculous to draw a

[11:13] straight line from from those games,

[11:17] board games, video games to sports

[11:18] betting, but personally, I I believe

[11:21] they train my brain to think in terms of

[11:23] probabilities and tradeoffs and

[11:25] long-term outcomes instead of single

[11:28] results. None of these games promise

[11:30] certainty. They reward good decisions

[11:33] over time. And that's the exact mindset

[11:36] that most betters are missing.

[11:39] So, what does any of this actually look

[11:41] like in practice?

[11:43] Not, you know, how do I win, but how do

[11:46] I stop in stop thinking in ways that

[11:49] guarantee I lose? A and I've recommended

[11:52] this before.

[11:54] It's a simple habit that I preach, but

[11:59] before you look at the odds of a game or

[12:02] whatever you're betting on, an event, a

[12:04] prop, force yourself to write down a

[12:08] probability,

[12:10] just do it. Sheet of paper, do it in

[12:12] your head if you have to type it at your

[12:14] computer. Not a vibe, not a lean, not

[12:18] who is guaranteed to win the game. an

[12:20] actual number, a probability. 60% chance

[12:23] that this team wins, 54% chance that

[12:26] this player goes over this number, 48%,

[12:29] whatever you think it is,

[12:32] then look at the price

[12:35] and do a comparison.

[12:38] That exercise alone will rewire your

[12:41] brain

[12:43] better than almost anything else because

[12:46] now you're you're disagreeing with the

[12:48] market on a number.

[12:51] You're not you're not speaking in

[12:52] absolutes.

[12:55] Another big one kind of in the same vein

[12:58] is separating

[13:00] review from results.

[13:04] There's lots of things you can track

[13:06] after the fact. Closing line value is a

[13:08] big one. But oftentimes after a game, I

[13:11] I don't ask myself, did I win? I mean,

[13:14] that's very obvious. You either won your

[13:15] outcome or lo or lost. I often ask

[13:17] myself, would I make that bet again at

[13:20] that price?

[13:22] And of course, we have the benefit of

[13:24] knowing what happened in the game. But

[13:27] if the answer is yes, and you didn't get

[13:29] a terrible price relative to the market,

[13:32] then the result kind of doesn't matter.

[13:37] process was good. If the answer is no

[13:40] and you somehow won, well, for me,

[13:44] I'll take the money, don't get me wrong,

[13:46] but the wind doesn't save it for me.

[13:48] That's that's an example of where maybe

[13:50] process broke down.

[13:53] And this one sounds counterintuitive,

[13:55] but but it does matter. This was a big

[13:57] one for me. going from a a pure loser to

[14:00] a winner. I did have to take a lot of

[14:02] time off and sometimes I would watch

[14:05] sports without betting. Not a lot of

[14:07] people do that nowadays. If you only

[14:09] experience games through a financial

[14:11] lens, every outcome feels personal.

[14:16] Watching without money on the line

[14:18] sometimes reminds you how chaotic sports

[14:22] actually are and how often, you know,

[14:25] the obvious outcomes don't happen.

[14:29] People say this all the time. There's no

[14:31] chance that this happens and then it

[14:33] does. There is chaos in sports. Now,

[14:36] none of this guarantees success. And

[14:39] that's actually part of the point here.

[14:42] It just moves you away from certainty

[14:45] and closer to probability.

[14:48] And that's where betting actually lives.

[14:52] That's the reality. At the end of the

[14:54] day, this isn't just about predicting

[14:56] the future. It's also about respecting

[14:58] that uncertainty exists. Most betterers

[15:01] don't lose because they lack information

[15:06] or, you know, the ability to understand

[15:08] a game. They lose because they think

[15:11] betting is about being right instead of

[15:15] being right often enough at the prices

[15:19] that they're paying. I can't stress that

[15:21] enough. Thinking probabilistically is

[15:24] not suddenly going to make you

[15:25] profitable.

[15:28] If you suck at betting and you think

[15:30] probabilistically,

[15:33] it might not change things necessarily.

[15:36] It's certainly not going to protect you

[15:37] from bad runs. It's not going to save

[15:39] you from random variance,

[15:42] but what it will do is stop you from

[15:46] thinking in ways that will guarantee

[15:49] long-term failure. If you think in terms

[15:52] of absolutes,

[15:54] you are going to fail in the long run.

[15:57] Plain and simple. If this video made you

[15:59] think differently in any way, hit like,

[16:02] hit subscribe. Circles off is all about

[16:04] process,

[16:06] not necessarily picks. And I'm curious

[16:08] if you've had similar experiences.

[16:10] What's a game, a puzzle, maybe something

[16:12] totally unrelated to betting that you

[16:15] think actually helped you think better

[16:17] about probability? Drop it down in the

[16:19] comments below. I read all of them

[16:21] because if there's one thing I'm

[16:22] confident about, it's this. Betting

[16:26] isn't about certainty. It's about

[16:28] learning how to live without [music]

[16:31] having it.



All Sportsbooks

Current LocationOhio

Recent Stories

Loading recent stories




Betstamp FAQ's

How does Betstamp work?
Betstamp is a sports betting tool designed to help bettors increase their profits and manage their process. Betstamp provides real-time bet tracking, bet analysis, odds comparison, and the ability to follow your friends or favourite handicappers!
Can I leverage Betstamp as an app to track bets or a bet tracker?
You can easily track your bets on Betstamp by selecting the bet and entering in an amount, just as if you were on an actual sportsbook! You can then use the analysis tool to figure out exactly what types of bets you’re making/losing money on so that you can maximize future profits.
Can Betstamp help me track Closing Line Value (CLV) when betting?
Betstamp will track CLV for every single main market bet that you track within the app against the odds of the sportsbook you tracked the bet at, as well as the sportsbook that had the best odds when the line closed. You can learn more about Closing Line Value and what it is by clicking HERE
Is Betstamp a Live Odds App?
Betstamp provides the ability to compare live odds for every league that is supported on the site, which includes: NFL, NBA, MLB, NHL, UFC, Bellator, ATP, WTA, WNBA, CFL, NCAAF, NCAAB, PGA, LIV, SERA, BUND, MLS, UCL, EPL, LIG1, & LIGA.
See More FAQs

For more specific questions, email us at contact@betstamp.app

Contact Us